Madison Review

MADiSON: A Brilliantly Terrifying Descent into Photographic Madness

If there’s one indie horror title that left an imprint on my brain—like a photo developing in darkroom dread—it’s MADiSON. Developed by Bloodious Games, this first-person psychological horror game delivers a unique blend of slow-burning atmosphere and vicious jump scares. It’s a game that takes its time creeping under your skin before shocking you into a cold sweat. I’ve played it multiple times now, and even on the third playthrough, it still managed to unsettle me. That kind of lasting fear is rare—and worth talking about.

In this review, I’ll break down what makes MADiSON such a standout in the horror genre, from its chilling narrative to its unforgettable camera mechanic. Whether you’re a seasoned horror fan or someone who enjoys games that toy with your sanity, MADiSON deserves a place on your radar—and maybe even in your nightmares.


A Haunting Premise with Depth

The story opens in chaos. You wake up in a dark, blood-splattered room with your hands covered in something that definitely isn’t paint. You play as Luca, a teenage boy whose 16th birthday party takes a hellish turn after receiving an old instant camera as a gift. That camera has a history—one soaked in blood, occult rituals, and a cursed photographer named Madison Hale who used it to commit gruesome murders. It doesn’t take long to realize that her malevolent spirit may have latched onto you.

At its core, MADiSON is a psychological horror story about generational trauma, possession, and guilt. The game gradually reveals the dark history of your family—your grandfather’s ties to the occult, your father’s madness, and Madison Hale’s own satanic legacy. These elements unfold slowly, giving you time to absorb the tension and making every room you enter feel like a page in a grim history book.

What makes the story so effective is its subtlety. MADiSON never rushes to explain everything. You piece together the lore through audio tapes, photographs, newspaper clippings, and your increasingly unreliable memories. The backstory is as much about Luca’s psychological unraveling as it is about ghosts and demons. That ambiguity—what’s real and what’s not—is where MADiSON really excels.


Atmosphere Meets Adrenaline: A Perfect Horror Blend

What kept me coming back to MADiSON wasn’t just the scares, but the way it balances different types of horror. There’s a slow, creeping dread that builds with every flickering light, every photograph that develops into something horrifying, and every whisper that dances through the corridors. Then, just when you start to get comfortable, it throws a jump scare so violent and well-timed that you’re knocked out of your seat.

Too often, games lean too far in one direction—either relying solely on atmosphere or abusing jump scares until they become predictable. MADiSON walks the tightrope perfectly. It knows how to toy with your expectations. Sometimes you expect a jump scare and nothing happens. Other times, it hits you when you’re doing something mundane, like developing film or examining a seemingly innocuous object. This unpredictability keeps you on edge the entire time.

The audio design plays a massive role here. Every creak of the floorboards, every whisper behind your back, every distorted tape recording makes the house feel alive—and not in a good way. The tension is sustained so well that even quiet moments feel dangerous.


The Camera: More Than a Gimmick

Let’s talk about that camera, because it’s the heart of MADiSON—both narratively and mechanically. In a lesser game, the instant camera could have been a simple flashlight replacement or a tool for cheap jump scares. But here, it’s so much more. You use the camera to solve puzzles, unveil hidden passageways, trigger hauntings, and uncover the supernatural. Each photo develops in real time, which adds to the anticipation. You never quite know what you’re going to see once the image finishes processing.

Sometimes, a photo reveals a clue you need to solve a puzzle. Other times, it reveals a figure standing behind you that wasn’t there before. One of the most brilliant mechanics involves using the flash to expose elements hidden in darkness or alternate realities—essentially peeling back the layers of the house’s twisted reality. It’s a simple but deeply effective mechanic, and it makes every use of the camera an anxiety-riddled experience.

It’s also worth noting that the camera ties into the lore in a meaningful way. Madison Hale used it in her own dark rituals, and as you retrace her steps, you begin to understand that you’re continuing her work—willingly or not. It blurs the line between protagonist and pawn, creating a uniquely chilling sense of complicit horror.


Replayability: Still Terrifying the Third Time Around

One of the biggest surprises for me was how well MADiSON held up on repeat playthroughs. By the third time through, I thought I’d be desensitized. I knew where the scares were. I knew which corridors were death traps and which closets were safe havens. But none of that mattered.

Why? Because MADiSON plays with your memory. The environment shifts just enough between playthroughs that you never feel fully in control. The house rearranges itself. Events trigger differently. Sometimes you’ll hear sounds that weren’t there before. And sometimes, even though you think you know what’s coming… something else happens.

Plus, the dread doesn’t come just from the unknown. It also comes from anticipation. Knowing that something terrifying is going to happen can sometimes be worse than not knowing—and MADiSON leans into that psychological angle hard.

I also found myself noticing new details with each playthrough. More layers to the story, hidden symbols in the photos, and subtleties in the voice acting that deepened the emotional weight of Luca’s descent into madness. That kind of depth is rare in horror games and gives MADiSON an edge when it comes to replay value.


Flaws? Few and Forgivable

As much as I love MADiSON, it’s not without its quirks. Some of the puzzles can be a little too obtuse, especially if you miss a small clue or don’t backtrack at the right time. There were moments where I had to resort to trial and error or even check a walkthrough just to move forward.

And while the story is rich and dark, it occasionally gets a bit lost in its own complexity. The game seems to assume you’re always paying close attention—which, to be fair, you probably are because you’re terrified—but even then, some narrative threads can feel disconnected or underdeveloped by the end.

Still, these flaws are minor compared to what the game does right. They never broke immersion. If anything, the occasional confusion added to the dreamlike, nightmarish quality of the experience.


Final Thoughts: A Modern Horror Classic

MADiSON is one of the best indie horror games I’ve ever played. It’s not just a collection of scares—it’s a cohesive, emotionally disturbing, mechanically inventive experience. The mix of atmospheric horror and shocking jump scares is expertly handled, and the game respects your intelligence while also doing everything it can to destroy your nerves.

I wish there were a sequel. The story, while concluded in one sense, feels ripe for expansion. I’d love to see more of Madison Hale’s origins or explore a different cursed artifact in the same universe. The mechanics, the lore, and the tone all have room to grow—and I’d gladly step back into that haunted house if Bloodious Games gives us the chance.

Is it the scariest game I’ve ever played? Maybe not the scariest, but it’s in my top ten for sure—and that’s not a list I update lightly. The fact that I still felt unsettled on a third playthrough says everything you need to know.

So if you’re a horror fan who enjoys psychological torment, immersive storytelling, and game mechanics that feel like an extension of the terror itself, MADiSON is a must-play.

Just… maybe don’t play it alone in the dark.

Clap Clap Review

Clap Clap Review – The Indie Horror Game That Slapped Harder Than Expected

If you’re looking for a short horror game that delivers genuine scares, unsettling atmosphere, and a surprisingly fresh concept, Clap Clap might just be your next creepy obsession. This indie horror game doesn’t rely on over-the-top gore or jump scare spam—it slowly creeps into your brain with suspense, sound design, and one incredibly cursed watering can.

In a crowded field of scary indie games, Clap Clap stands out—not just because of its haunting premise, but because it feels like a teaser for something bigger. It’s compact, smart, and well-executed, even if it did drive me mildly insane during the gardening portion (we’ll get there).

Let’s break down why Clap Clap is absolutely worth your time—and why I never want to water a digital plant again.


What Is Clap Clap?

Clap Clap is a first-person indie horror game where you take on a mysterious job in a quiet, isolated location. From the beginning, the atmosphere is oppressive. You don’t know who hired you or what’s really going on—and the only thing louder than your growing paranoia is the strange, echoing clap that follows you through the darkness.

Sound design is at the heart of the experience. The titular clap serves as an auditory cue that something is not right, and it builds suspense in the same way Phasmophobia or The Mortuary Assistant use ambient tension to keep you constantly on edge.

Despite its low-poly indie graphics, the game manages to be deeply immersive. You’ll find yourself hesitating before opening doors or completing simple tasks, just in case you hear that clap again.


Short But Effective Horror Experience

One of the biggest things to note about Clap Clap is its short gameplay length. Most players will finish it in under an hour, making it an ideal game for streamers, YouTubers, or horror fans looking for a solid scare without a big time commitment.

But make no mistake—this game may be short, but it’s scary. On my first playthrough, I had at least three genuine jump scares, all triggered by clever pacing and that nerve-wracking sound design. Even more impressive? It still got me on the second playthrough. That’s rare in a horror game, especially one this short.

If you’re searching for quick horror games that still hit hard, Clap Clap should be at the top of your list.


The Lore Has Legs (and Probably Claps)

Here’s what surprised me: there’s a real sense of lore beneath the surface of this game. Without info dumps or heavy exposition, Clap Clap hints at a larger story about the entity stalking you. Who—or what—is clapping? Is it an old spirit? An ancient curse? Some kind of interdimensional being that only communicates via ominous applause?

The game doesn’t give you all the answers, which is part of its charm. It teases just enough that horror lore lovers will find themselves theorizing long after the credits roll.

There’s something very SCP Foundation about it—the sense that you’re just seeing one incident in a much larger, unseen world. If this game ever gets a sequel or expansion, I’d play it in a heartbeat. The foundation is already there for a larger narrative, and it has serious potential.


The Watering Can from Hell

Now let’s talk about the one thing that nearly made me rage-quit this otherwise fantastic game: the garden.

At one point, you’re asked to water a small garden. Easy, right? That’s what I thought. But the watering can physics in Clap Clap are some of the most cursed I’ve ever experienced in a game. It handles like it was coded by an eldritch being who had never seen water or cans before.

Trying to angle the can correctly, get the water to pour, and actually land it on the plants feels like doing surgery with oven mitts on. I spent more time wrestling with the watering can than I did hiding from the monster. And that’s saying something, because the monster is very much out to get you.

Is it game-breaking? No. But it’s definitely a speed bump in an otherwise smooth horror experience. If you’re into horror puzzle games, this one might leave you shaking your head (and your can).


Replayability and Scare Factor

Let’s be honest—replayability isn’t where Clap Clap shines. Once you’ve experienced the scares and revealed the core mystery, there’s not a ton of reason to revisit it. That said, I did go through it again, and it still got me. A second playthrough can help uncover subtle environmental clues and details that you missed the first time, especially if you’re into uncovering lore and analyzing monster behavior.

If you’re creating content—whether that’s a horror gaming channel, Twitch stream, or TikTok scream compilation—Clap Clap is still a great choice. Its tight structure makes it perfect for a one-sitting upload, and you’ll definitely have a few memorable reactions to share.


Visuals and Sound – Simple, Yet Spooky

Graphically, Clap Clap doesn’t try to impress you with hyperrealism or next-gen lighting. But what it does do is use shadows, space, and silence incredibly well. The environments are minimal but atmospheric. There’s a creeping tension baked into every hallway and task.

The real MVP, though, is the sound design. From the direction of the clapping to subtle ambient noise, the game creates a true sense of dread. Even without any visual jump scares, it still manages to make you flinch just by making you listen.

For fans of psychological horror games, that’s a big win. The game knows that sometimes, what you don’t see is scarier than what you do.


Should You Play Clap Clap?

If you’re someone who:

  • Loves indie horror games with unique concepts
  • Wants a scary game you can finish in one night
  • Appreciates clever sound design and subtle lore
  • Doesn’t mind a small dose of gardening-induced rage

…then yes. You absolutely should play Clap Clap.

It’s the kind of game that sneaks up on you—both literally and figuratively. One minute, you’re doing basic chores; the next, you’re hiding in a corner wondering if you’re about to get clapped to death by some unknowable entity.

It’s funny, it’s freaky, and it’s strangely memorable. If it ever gets expanded into a longer game, I’ll be first in line.


Final Verdict

Clap Clap proves that a horror game doesn’t need to be long to be effective. With its creepy core idea, effective soundscape, and potential-rich monster lore, it earns a solid spot on the list of top indie horror games of the year—even if the watering can should come with a rage warning.

🧼 Final Score: 4 out of 5 Claps
(-1 clap for the garden incident. I will never forget.)


Looking for More?

If you enjoyed this Clap Clap review and want more indie horror game recommendations, short horror game reviews, and underrated scary games to try next, make sure to:

✅ Bookmark this blog
✅ Subscribe for weekly horror content
✅ Drop a comment: Did the clapping get you too? Or was it the watering can that broke your soul?

Stay spooky—and maybe keep your hands out of strange gardens.

Evil Dead (2013): When Reading a Book Becomes a Death Sentence

Summarized in One Sentence: A group of friends go to a cabin to help someone get clean, but instead of kicking addiction, they end up kicking the bucket—thanks to a book that literally warned them not to read it.


Few horror remakes manage to capture the raw intensity of their predecessors while carving out their own identity, but Evil Dead (2013) accomplishes this with blood-soaked brilliance. Fede Álvarez’s reimagining of Sam Raimi’s classic is a relentless, gore-drenched nightmare that pays homage to the original while delivering a fresh, unflinching vision of terror. With stunning practical effects, a chilling atmosphere, and a surprising emotional core, Evil Dead isn’t just a worthy successor—it’s one of the best modern horror films, proving that some nightmares are worth revisiting.

The acting in Evil Dead (2013) is a standout element, with Jane Levy delivering an unforgettable performance as Mia. Her transformation from a vulnerable recovering addict to a nightmarish Deadite and ultimately a fierce final girl is both emotionally compelling and terrifying. The supporting cast, including Shiloh Fernandez, Lou Taylor Pucci, Jessica Lucas, and Elizabeth Blackmore, all bring solid performances that elevate the film beyond standard horror fare. While the dialogue leans into the genre’s typical simplicity, it avoids excessive camp, maintaining a serious and ominous tone. The script smartly uses its characters’ strained relationships—especially the tension between Mia and her brother, David—to add weight to their interactions, making their struggles feel personal even amid the carnage.

Photo by Jack Gittoes on Pexels.com

While Evil Dead (2013) doesn’t break much new ground in terms of originality, it still manages to feel fresh and engaging. The film follows the familiar setup of young adults trapped in a remote cabin with supernatural forces, closely mirroring the structure of the 1981 classic. However, it sets itself apart with a darker, more serious tone, a focus on addiction as a thematic undercurrent, and some of the most brutal practical effects in modern horror. While it doesn’t reinvent the genre or stray too far from its source material, it embraces its role as a no-holds-barred gorefest, delivering exactly what fans expect with just enough twists to keep it from feeling like a hollow rehash.

One of Evil Dead (2013)’s greatest strengths is its commitment to realism, especially in its use of practical effects and the raw, visceral nature of its horror. The injuries, gore, and character reactions feel disturbingly real, adding to the film’s relentless intensity. However, there is one noticeable inconsistency that stands out—the necklace that Mia destroys early in the film is mysteriously intact by the end. Given the movie’s otherwise grounded approach, this detail feels like a rare oversight, though it doesn’t significantly detract from the overall experience. It’s a small flaw in an otherwise immersive and brutal horror film that prioritizes tension, atmosphere, and sheer carnage over nitpicky continuity.

Evil Dead (2013) masterfully builds a suffocating horror atmosphere that lingers from start to finish. The film’s isolated cabin setting, drenched in shadows and decay, immediately sets an eerie tone, while the relentless downpour and muted color palette heighten the feeling of dread. The cinematography captures every grotesque detail with precision, making the violence feel disturbingly real, and the sound design—filled with guttural Deadite growls, bone-chilling whispers, and unsettling silence—keeps the tension razor-sharp. Unlike many modern horror films that rely on cheap jump scares, Evil Dead thrives on an unrelenting sense of terror, making viewers feel trapped alongside the characters as the horror escalates to its brutal climax. The film’s suspense is expertly crafted, with scenes that stretch the audience’s nerves to their breaking point before unleashing a horrifying payoff. Moments like Natalie cautiously approaching the plastic-wrapped Deadite in the cellar or Eric flipping through the accursed book, oblivious to the horror he’s unleashing, are masterfully paced, creating a nerve-wracking build-up before the inevitable bloodshed. Evil Dead doesn’t just shock—it keeps viewers in a state of constant, unbearable tension, proving that true horror lies in the anticipation of what’s to come.

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

One of Evil Dead (2013)’s most effective horror elements is its masterful use of sound, which amplifies the film’s overwhelming sense of dread. Roque Baños’ chilling score blends seamlessly with the film’s terrifying sound design, creating an auditory experience that grips the viewer from start to finish. The standout element is the incorporation of an air raid siren into the soundtrack—a haunting, war-like wail that builds tension and signals impending doom. Rather than feeling forced, the siren melds naturally with the film’s relentless chaos, mirroring the terror unfolding on screen. Equally impressive is the film’s strategic use of silence, particularly in the climactic moment right before Mia accidentally runs over a Deadite. The near-total absence of sound creates an agonizing pause, forcing the audience to hold their breath before the sudden, explosive impact shatters the quiet with brutal force. This contrast between eerie silence and overwhelming noise is executed flawlessly, making the moment hit even harder and solidifying Evil Dead as a masterclass in horror sound design.

The special effects in Evil Dead (2013) are nothing short of spectacular, delivering some of the most gruesome and realistic horror visuals in modern cinema. What sets the film apart is its dedication to practical effects, with director Fede Álvarez famously avoiding CGI whenever possible. From gushing wounds to skin being peeled away, every injury and act of self-mutilation feels disturbingly tangible, adding to the film’s brutal intensity. The possessed Deadites are brought to life with horrifying makeup and prosthetics, making their grotesque transformations feel all the more visceral. Standout moments, like the nail gun attack, the brutal arm amputation, and the blood-drenched chainsaw finale, showcase just how far the film pushes its gore without feeling excessive or cartoonish. The sheer attention to detail in every blood-splattered frame makes Evil Dead a nightmarish experience that horror fans won’t soon forget.

Photo by Photo By: Kaboompics.com on Pexels.com

Another great aspect, I particularly appreciated, is that it doesn’t rely on cheap jump scares to be scary. Instead of quick, predictable frights, the movie builds up pure terror through disturbing visuals, nonstop tension, and brutal, in-your-face gore. The practical effects make every injury feel painfully real—like Mia slicing her own tongue in half or Natalie slowly sawing off her arm. On top of that, the movie plays with psychological horror, using Mia’s addiction to mess with reality and make her possession even creepier. The Deadites are genuinely terrifying, with their eerie voices, unsettling movements, and relentless cruelty. Instead of quick shocks that you forget in seconds, Evil Dead sticks with you, crawling under your skin and making sure you’ll be thinking about it long after it’s over.

One of the coolest things about Evil Dead (2013) is how it sneaks in tons of Easter eggs for fans of the original films. From the classic Delta 88 car abandoned outside the cabin—a signature vehicle in Sam Raimi’s movies—to the infamous chainsaw sitting ominously in the tool shed, the movie is packed with nods to its predecessors. Even the way the camera rushes through the woods in that frantic, demonic POV style is a direct homage to Raimi’s signature shot. There’s also the moment when Mia’s demonic voice eerily whispers, “We’re gonna get you,” echoing the creepy lullaby from The Evil Dead (1981). And while Bruce Campbell’s Ash isn’t part of the main story, his iconic presence is felt throughout, especially in the post-credits scene where he briefly appears, giving fans a simple yet satisfying “Groovy.” These little touches make Evil Dead (2013) more than just a remake—they show a deep love for the franchise while still carving out a fresh, terrifying identity of its own.

While Evil Dead (2013) is an incredibly well-crafted horror film, there are a few things that knock it down a notch. One of the biggest eye-rolling moments is when a character says, “You don’t have to do this,”—a painfully cliché line that feels out of place in a movie that otherwise takes itself seriously. The film also leans into some unnecessarily grim choices, like the discovery of a bunch of dead cats hanging in the cellar, which feels more gross than effective. On top of that, the dog’s death adds to the shock factor but feels like an overused trope in horror. The decision to read from the Book of the Dead is another frustrating moment—Eric literally has to work to translate the warnings telling him not to continue, making his actions feel even more forced and stupid. And while the film does a great job of wrapping up its main story, the last-second tease of a potential sequel feels tacked on rather than meaningful. None of these things ruin the movie, but they do hold it back from being completely flawless.

Overall, Evil Dead (2013) is a brutally intense and expertly crafted horror film that stands as one of the best remakes in the genre. With its stunning practical effects, relentless atmosphere, and nerve-shredding suspense, it delivers an unflinching experience that sticks with you long after the credits roll. While it has a few minor missteps—some unnecessary tropes, a questionable character decision or two, and a sequel-bait ending—these don’t take away from the sheer terror and craftsmanship on display. It doesn’t rely on cheap jump scares, instead using disturbing imagery, masterful sound design, and overwhelming dread to keep audiences on edge. Whether you’re a longtime Evil Dead fan or just looking for a genuinely terrifying horror movie, this one absolutely delivers.


Final Scare Me Please Score:  93 out of 100

What did you think of the movie? Anything we missed? Did you like it more than the original? Was the post-credits scene worth it? Let us know in the comments below!

Link to official trailer.

13 Irish Horror Movies to Spook Up Your St. Patrick’s Day

St. Patrick’s Day is usually all about green beer, parades, and festive celebrations—but if you’re looking to add a little terror to your holiday, why not dive into some Irish horror? From eerie folklore to modern nightmares, Ireland has produced some truly chilling films that deserve a spot on your watchlist. Whether you’re in the mood for supernatural scares, folk horror, or spine-tingling thrillers, these 13 Irish horror movies will bring the perfect dose of fear to your St. Patty’s Day festivities.

1. Caveat

Caveat (2020) is a slow-burn psychological horror that knows how to get under your skin. The story follows Isaac, a drifter dealing with memory loss, who accepts a strange but seemingly easy job—looking after his landlord’s troubled niece, Olga, in an old, isolated house. The catch? He has to wear a leather harness that keeps him confined to certain areas, supposedly for Olga’s safety. But as Isaac settles in, eerie things start happening. Olga acts bizarrely, a creepy toy drum bunny seems to have a mind of its own, and the house itself feels like it’s hiding something sinister. As the mystery unravels, Isaac realizes he’s been lured into something far more terrifying than he ever imagined. With its unsettling atmosphere, minimal dialogue, and a sense of dread that builds with every scene, Caveat is an unique choice to watch this holiday.

2. Oddity

Directed by the same person as Caveat, Oddity (2024) is a psychological horror film that creeps under your skin. The story follows a woman struggling with grief after her twin sister is brutally murdered. But her mourning quickly turns into something far more disturbing as she digs deeper into the mystery surrounding her sister’s death.  She begins to sense a sinister presence lurking just beneath the surface—something that feels ancient, supernatural, and terrifyingly close.  If you’re a fan of psychological horror with a folk-horror twist, Oddity is definitely worth a watch.  Plus, the wooden doll is one of the creepiest I’ve ever seen before.

3. Nails

Photo by Feyza Yu0131ldu0131ru0131m on Pexels.com

Nails (2017) is a tense and claustrophobic horror film that turns the fear of helplessness into a living nightmare. The story follows Dana, a woman left paralyzed and unable to speak after a horrific car accident. Confined to a hospital bed with only a speech-generating device to communicate, she soon becomes convinced that a dark presence is stalking her in the room. As she desperately tries to prove that something sinister is lurking in the hospital, those around her dismiss her fears as hallucinations caused by trauma. But as the malevolent force—known as Nails—grows more aggressive, Dana realizes she’s running out of time. With eerie hospital corridors, a terrifyingly inescapable setting, and a relentless antagonist, Nails delivers a chilling blend of horror that keeps you on edge until the very end.

4. The Canal

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

The Canal (2014) is a haunting supernatural thriller that combines psychological tension with chilling horror. The story centers on David, a film archivist who begins to unravel a terrifying mystery after discovering that his new home, situated next to a canal, has a dark and violent past. When his wife is murdered, David starts to believe that her death is connected to the eerie events surrounding the house. As he digs deeper into the building’s history, he becomes increasingly convinced that a malevolent force is haunting him, manifesting through disturbing visions and inexplicable occurrences. 

5. The Cellar

Photo by Jorge Teves Valdez on Pexels.com

The Cellar (2022) is a creepy supernatural horror film that knows how to build tension and keep you on edge. The story follows Keira, a mother who moves her family into an old, isolated house, only to realize something is seriously wrong with the place. When her daughter mysteriously vanishes after going down into the cellar, Keira becomes obsessed with uncovering the truth. The more she digs into the house’s dark history, the more she starts experiencing terrifying visions and encounters with an eerie, unseen force. If you’re into slow-burning supernatural horror with a creepy, haunted-house vibe, The Cellar is definitely worth a watch.

6. Boys From County Hell

Photo by Ronald Slaton on Pexels.com

Boys from County Hell (2020) is a fun and bloody horror-comedy that puts an Irish twist on the vampire genre. Set in a small, quiet town known for its local legend of Abhartach—a vampire said to have inspired Dracula—the film follows a group of road workers who accidentally disturb an ancient burial site. What starts as just another day on the job quickly turns into a fight for survival when they unknowingly awaken a terrifying and bloodthirsty creature. As the body count rises, the group must band together to stop the unstoppable before the entire town is wiped out. Blending gory thrills with dark humor and Irish folklore, Boys from County Hell is a fresh, action-packed take on vampire horror that doesn’t hold back on scares or laughs.

7. From the Dark

Photo by Francesco Ungaro on Pexels.com

From the Dark (2014) is an intense, stripped-down survival horror film that thrives on atmosphere and suspense. The story follows a young couple, Sarah and Mark, who get stranded in the Irish countryside after their car breaks down. As night falls, they stumble upon a remote farmhouse—only to realize they’re being hunted by a terrifying creature that lurks in the darkness. With no way to escape and only a dim light to keep the monster at bay, Sarah must fight to survive the night. What makes From the Dark so effective is its simplicity—it relies on tension, eerie shadows, and a relentless sense of dread rather than over-the-top effects. If you love creature features, this one is definitely worth a watch.

8. The Hole in the Ground

Photo by Nothing Ahead on Pexels.com

The Hole in the Ground (2019) is a creepy, slow-burn horror film that taps into every parent’s worst fear. The story follows Sarah, a single mother who moves to a remote house in the Irish countryside with her young son, Chris. One night, Chris disappears into the woods near a massive sinkhole, only to return acting… different. He looks the same, but something about him feels off—his behavior is unsettling, and Sarah starts to suspect that whatever came back might not be her son at all. As her paranoia grows, so does the eerie atmosphere, building up to a terrifying realization. The Hole in the Ground is a must-watch for fans of folk horror and another great choice for a St. Patty’s day movie night.

9. Grabbers

Photo by Mario Gu00f3mez on Pexels.com

Grabbers (2012) is a hilarious horror-comedy that mixes alien monsters with classic Irish pub culture. The story takes place on a small Irish island where a group of locals, including a no-nonsense police officer and her charmingly lazy partner, discover that bloodsucking sea creatures have invaded their town. The catch? The monsters can’t handle alcohol—so the only way to survive is to get absolutely hammered. What follows is a wild, booze-fueled battle for survival, packed with witty humor, fun creature effects, and plenty of Irish charm. If you love horror movies that don’t take themselves too seriously, Grabbers is the perfect mix of comedy, action, and monster mayhem.

10. Sea Fever

Photo by cottonbro studio on Pexels.com

Sea Fever (2019) is a slow-burning, horror film that blends sci-fi with deep-sea terror. The story follows Siobhán, a marine biology student who joins a small fishing crew for a research trip in the Atlantic. What starts as a routine expedition quickly turns into a nightmare when the boat gets stranded, and the crew discovers a mysterious, glowing organism lurking beneath them. As an unknown parasite begins infecting the ship, paranoia and desperation set in, forcing everyone to fight for survival. Sea Fever delivers a decent mix of isolation horror and Lovecraftian dread, making it a must-watch for fans of slow-burn thrillers like The Thing or The Abyss.

11. Unwelcome

Photo by Lord Ander Fotografia on Pexels.com

Unwelcome (2022) is a creepy, folklore-driven horror film that mixes home invasion thrills with Irish mythology. The story follows a couple, Jamie and Maya, who escape city life for a quiet house in rural Ireland, hoping for a fresh start. But their new home comes with an unsettling warning—they must leave a daily offering for the mysterious creatures that live in the woods behind their house. When they fail to follow the tradition, things take a terrifying turn as the ancient, bloodthirsty goblins known as the Redcaps make their presence known. With a mix of creature horror, suspense, and a dark fairy tale vibe, Unwelcome delivers a unique ride that keeps your attention until the end.

12. You Are Not My Mother

Photo by Steven Hylands on Pexels.com

You Are Not My Mother (2021) is a slow-burning psychological horror that taps into eerie Irish folklore and deep family trauma. The story follows Char, a quiet teenager living in a rough neighborhood in Dublin, whose mother suddenly disappears—only to return acting very… off. At first, Char tries to believe things will go back to normal, but her mother’s strange behavior grows more disturbing by the day. As Char digs into her family’s past, she starts to suspect that the person in her home might not be her mother at all. With its eerie atmosphere, unsettling performances, and a creepy folklore twist, You Are Not My Mother is a chilling, emotional horror film that sticks with you long after it’s over.

13. Leprechaun

Photo by RDNE Stock project on Pexels.com

Leprechaun (1993) is a ridiculous, campy horror-comedy that turns Irish folklore into pure ’90s B-movie fun. The story follows a greedy, mischievous leprechaun (played by Warwick Davis) who will stop at nothing to get his stolen gold back—even if it means going on a murderous rampage. When a group of unsuspecting people, including a young Jennifer Aniston in her film debut, accidentally release him from captivity, they quickly realize that this pint-sized terror isn’t just looking for his gold—he’s out for blood. With cheesy one-liners, over-the-top kills, and a bizarre mix of horror and humor, Leprechaun is the kind of so-bad-it’s-good movie that’s perfect for a St. Patrick’s Day horror binge.

Whether you’re in the mood for eerie folk horror, claustrophobic thrillers, or campy creature features, these 13 Irish horror movies offer a perfect mix of scares for your St. Patrick’s Day watchlist. From ancient curses to bloodthirsty monsters, these films tap into Ireland’s rich mythology and eerie landscapes to deliver unforgettable chills. So grab some popcorn (and maybe a pint), turn off the lights, and let these Irish horror gems bring a little terror to your holiday celebrations. Just be sure to keep an eye on the shadows—you never know what might be lurking.

The Conference (2023) Review: A Bloody Slasher That Skewers Workplace Culture

Photo by Kindel Media on Pexels.com

The Conference (original title: Konferensen) is a Swedish horror-comedy that blends workplace satire with classic slasher thrills. Directed by Patrik Eklund and based on the novel by Mats Strandberg, the film follows a dysfunctional group of municipal employees who embark on a team-building retreat at a secluded resort. What starts as an uncomfortable corporate getaway filled with forced bonding exercises and underlying tensions quickly takes a dark turn when a masked killer begins picking them off one by one. As hidden corruption, personal grudges, and office politics bubble to the surface, the so-called retreat spirals into a gruesome fight for survival. Mixing sharp humor with brutal horror, The Conference offers a blood-soaked critique of corporate culture while delivering all the slasher thrills fans crave.

The Conference sets itself apart by seamlessly blending slasher horror with workplace satire, creating a film that is both darkly comedic and brutally intense. Rather than merely relying on traditional slasher tropes, the film takes a sharp, observational approach to corporate culture, using its horror elements to amplify the inherent absurdities of office life. From forced bonding exercises to empty motivational speeches, The Conference exposes the insincerity, power struggles, and underlying tensions that often fester in professional environments. By weaving these workplace dynamics into a slasher framework, the film turns mundane office frustrations into genuine sources of terror, making it all the more engaging for anyone who has ever felt trapped in a toxic work environment.

Photo by Mike Gonzu00e1lez on Pexels.com

The humor is both biting and painfully relatable, painting a satirical yet all-too-real picture of the social hierarchies and dysfunction that exist in many workplaces. The film doesn’t just poke fun at these dynamics—it weaponizes them, using office politics as a driving force behind the escalating horror. As the retreat unfolds, the characters’ hidden resentments and professional betrayals bubble to the surface, creating a natural tension that builds long before the first kill. This slow-burn approach makes the transition from comedy to horror feel organic rather than forced, and when the violence does erupt, it feels like a natural extension of the festering conflicts that have been simmering beneath the surface.

What makes this blend so effective is that the satire doesn’t undercut the horror—it enhances it. The film’s humor draws the audience in, making them laugh at the ridiculousness of corporate culture, only to pull the rug out from under them when the real danger arrives. By the time the killings begin, the comedic setup makes the violence feel even more shocking and unpredictable. This balance between humor and horror gives The Conference a unique tone that sets it apart from standard slasher fare, making it a standout in both the horror-comedy genre and workplace horror subgenre.

The characters, though exaggerated for comedic effect, remain surprisingly relatable, capturing the different archetypes found in any workplace— from the overly ambitious leader trying too hard to the disgruntled employee who refuses to play along. Their personal conflicts, fueled by hidden corruption and unresolved grudges, add depth to the story, making their eventual fates all the more impactful. The film uses these workplace dynamics to build suspense, turning mundane office frustrations into genuine sources of horror. The result is a slasher that not only delivers gruesome kills but also satirizes the corporate world with a razor-sharp edge.

Photo by X Y on Pexels.com

The film starts off more as a dark comedy, skillfully leaning into the inherent awkwardness of workplace retreats. It takes its time setting up the dynamics between the employees, highlighting the forced camaraderie, passive-aggressive exchanges, and mounting frustrations that make these kinds of corporate getaways so unbearable. The humor is dry and biting, with moments that feel almost too real for anyone who has ever endured an office retreat filled with trust falls, icebreakers, and empty motivational speeches. This slow-burn introduction allows the audience to get to know the characters, making the inevitable bloodshed more impactful when it finally arrives.

However, once the killing begins, The Conference wastes no time ramping up the tension and delivering relentless slasher thrills. The shift from comedy to horror is sudden but effective, catching both the characters and the audience off guard. The slasher elements are executed with precision, featuring intense chase sequences, gruesome kills, and a rising sense of dread that keeps the suspense high. The film embraces the best aspects of classic ‘80s slashers, from the unpredictability of who will survive to the sheer brutality of the deaths.

What makes these moments even more striking is the film’s use of practical effects and strong cinematography. The gore is visceral, with each kill designed to feel as brutal as possible—whether it’s a sudden, shocking attack or a drawn-out, tension-filled sequence that leaves the audience squirming. The cinematography enhances the horror, using shadows, wide shots, and claustrophobic angles to maximize the impact of each gruesome moment. Rather than relying on cheap jump scares, The Conference builds a sense of dread through its atmosphere and carefully choreographed violence, making it a standout entry in the modern slasher genre.

Photo by Marina Leonova on Pexels.com

One of the film’s greatest strengths is its ability to strike a delicate balance between humor and horror, making it an engaging and unpredictable ride from start to finish. The comedic moments are smartly woven into the script, serving as more than just throwaway gags—they provide insight into the characters, highlight the absurdity of corporate culture, and add a layer of satire that enhances the overall experience. Rather than diminishing the film’s horror elements, these well-placed moments of levity actually heighten the tension, making the brutal kills that follow feel even more shocking. The humor is dark, sometimes biting, and often uncomfortably relatable, especially for anyone familiar with office politics and the artificial camaraderie of workplace retreats.

At the center of the horror is the film’s masked killer, who, while not revolutionary in design, proves to be a menacing and highly effective presence. The character’s simplicity works in the film’s favor, keeping the focus on the suspense rather than over-explaining their origins or motives. The killer operates with a relentless brutality that keeps both the characters and the audience on edge, delivering moments of sheer chaos that feel unpredictable and intense. Their attacks are swift and unflinching, often catching victims off guard in ways that leave little time for escape. The film’s ability to blend moments of laugh-out-loud humor with pulse-pounding horror creates an experience that is both entertaining and nerve-wracking, proving that a well-executed horror-comedy can be just as thrilling as a traditional slasher.

On the downside, The Conference largely adheres to a familiar slasher formula, which may leave seasoned horror fans feeling like they’ve seen this story play out before. While the film cleverly integrates workplace satire, the overarching structure of the plot—isolated location, a group of unsuspecting victims, and a masked killer picking them off one by one—follows a well-worn path. This predictability means that while the film is undeniably entertaining, it doesn’t break new ground in terms of storytelling. Viewers who are looking for a slasher that reinvents the genre or subverts expectations may find themselves longing for more surprises.

Photo by MART PRODUCTION on Pexels.com

Another issue is the lack of depth in some of the supporting characters. While the film does a great job establishing workplace tensions and personality clashes, not all of the characters are given enough development to make their fates feel truly impactful. Some exist primarily to serve as fodder for the killer, and while this is common in slasher films, it does limit the emotional stakes. A few characters feel like they had the potential for more interesting arcs but are instead reduced to basic archetypes—the overbearing boss, the disgruntled employee, the comic relief. As a result, some deaths feel more like standard slasher set pieces rather than moments that carry weight.

Additionally, the pacing in the first act might test the patience of viewers expecting immediate horror. The film spends a considerable amount of time setting up the workplace dynamics and tensions between the employees before the bloodshed begins. While this character-driven approach allows for some strong comedic moments and makes the eventual horror more effective, those eager for non-stop thrills may find the early portion of the movie a bit slow. However, once the action starts, The Conference finds its rhythm, delivering a steady stream of suspense, gore, and chaos that keeps the energy high until the very end.

The Conference may not reinvent the slasher genre, but it delivers a highly entertaining blend of horror and comedy that stands out thanks to its sharp workplace satire and brutal kills. The film’s ability to balance dark humor with intense horror makes it a unique and engaging watch, even if its overall structure feels familiar. While some characters lack depth and the first act takes its time building momentum, the payoff is worth the wait, with thrilling chase sequences, gruesome deaths, and an atmosphere of escalating chaos. Fans of slasher films and horror comedies will find plenty to enjoy, especially those who appreciate a bit of corporate satire with their bloodshed. Whether you’re in it for the humor, the horror, or both, The Conference delivers a wild and bloody ride that’s well worth the watch.

Link to Original Trailer

The House Next Door by Darcy Coates: A Haunting Tale of Obsession and Terror

Darcy Coates has built a reputation for crafting atmospheric, spine-chilling horror novels that blend eerie settings with compelling storytelling, and The House Next Door is no exception. With its unsettling ambiance and relentless suspense, the novel immerses readers in a classic haunted house tale that delivers both thrills and mystery in equal measure. The story moves at a brisk pace, ensuring that tension remains high while never sacrificing the eerie, slow-burning dread that makes ghost stories so captivating. Packed with spine-tingling moments, shadowy figures, and an ever-present sense of unease, The House Next Door keeps readers on edge, unraveling its secrets in a way that feels both tantalizing and unsettling. Balancing supernatural horror with a gripping mystery, Coates masterfully weaves an engrossing narrative that is sure to keep fans of the genre hooked from beginning to end.

The story centers around Jo, a woman living in a peaceful suburban neighborhood—at least, it seems peaceful on the surface. However, the house next door has always unsettled her. Abandoned and shrouded in mystery, it carries a sinister reputation, with rumors of strange happenings and the eerie fact that no one who has lived there stays for long. Each former occupant has met with tragedy, reinforcing the belief that something is deeply wrong with the house.

Photo by Dominuz from wikimedia.com

Jo has always been curious about its secrets, but when a new family moves in, her fascination turns into an obsession. She feels an urgent need to warn them, especially as unsettling events begin to unfold around the property once again. What starts as a well-meaning concern soon pulls her deeper into the house’s dark history, leading her to uncover chilling truths that go beyond mere ghostly whispers. The more she investigates, the more she realizes the haunting isn’t just real—it’s far more dangerous than she ever imagined, and getting too close might come at a terrifying cost.

One of the novel’s strongest points is its pacing, which keeps the story engaging and tense without unnecessary filler. Coates doesn’t waste time with long-winded exposition or drawn-out backstories; instead, she throws the reader straight into the unsettling atmosphere of the haunted house, letting the mystery and suspense unfold naturally. From the very beginning, there’s a sense of unease that steadily builds, with eerie encounters, strange noises, and ghostly apparitions growing more intense as the story progresses.

Every chilling moment feels carefully placed to maintain a constant sense of dread without overwhelming the reader with nonstop horror. The haunting starts subtly—flickers of movement in the corner of the eye, an unnatural stillness in certain rooms—before escalating into something much more terrifying. This gradual build-up keeps the reader invested, making it impossible to put the book down.

Photo by Ekaterina Astakhova on Pexels.com

At the heart of the story is Jo, a protagonist who feels refreshingly real. She’s not the fearless, reckless type who runs headfirst into danger without thinking, but she’s also not a passive observer. Her curiosity, bravery, and determination drive the plot forward, yet she remains flawed in a way that makes her easy to relate to. She struggles with doubt, fear, and obsession, making her a well-rounded character whose actions feel believable. Watching her navigate the mystery of the haunted house while grappling with her own internal struggles adds depth to the story, making it more than just a series of scary moments—it’s also a compelling character-driven narrative.

The book leans more into suspense and atmosphere rather than outright horror, making it an excellent choice for readers who love a good ghost story without the need for excessive gore or shock value. Instead of relying on graphic scares, Coates builds tension through eerie descriptions, unsettling encounters, and the ever-present feeling that something sinister is lurking just out of sight. The novel keeps readers engaged with its creeping dread and gradual revelations rather than overwhelming them with nonstop frights, making it an ideal pick for those who prefer psychological chills over outright terror.

That said, while the book delivers plenty of spine-tingling moments, it doesn’t necessarily break new ground in the genre. Readers who seek deeply complex characters or entirely original ghost lore might find some elements of the story a bit familiar. The haunted house setup follows many of the classic tropes—strange noises, ominous history, and a protagonist drawn too deeply into the mystery for their own good. While these elements are well-executed, seasoned horror fans may find the twists and turns enjoyable but not entirely surprising.

Photo by Maria Argiroudaki on Pexels.com

Coates’ writing style is engaging and easy to read, which makes the book highly accessible to both casual readers and dedicated horror fans alike. The prose is straightforward, avoiding overly elaborate descriptions or complicated narrative structures, which helps maintain the book’s fast pacing. However, those looking for a more literary or deeply nuanced exploration of supernatural horror may find it somewhat predictable. Still, for those who appreciate a well-told ghost story that prioritizes suspense and readability, The House Next Door delivers exactly what it promises—a thrilling, spooky ride with just the right amount of mystery and tension.

Overall, The House Next Door is a solid and engaging haunted house novel that successfully delivers a gripping plot filled with eerie moments and an ever-present sense of dread. Coates crafts a story that feels both familiar and fresh, using classic ghost story elements while maintaining a level of suspense that keeps readers hooked from start to finish. The novel balances supernatural horror with psychological tension, creating an atmosphere that lingers long after the final page.

While it doesn’t necessarily reinvent the haunted house genre, it doesn’t need to—what it does, it does well. The book embraces the eerie, slow-burning tension that makes ghost stories so compelling, offering a satisfying blend of mystery, suspense, and chilling encounters. Fans of haunted house tales will appreciate the novel’s ability to maintain a sense of foreboding without relying on excessive gore or shock value. Instead, it focuses on atmosphere, unsettling imagery, and a steadily unraveling mystery that keeps the pages turning.

Photo by Suzy Hazelwood on Pexels.com

Coates’ straightforward and accessible writing style ensures that the story remains fast-paced and easy to digest, making it a great choice for both seasoned horror fans and those looking for an introduction to the genre. The narrative is engaging, the pacing is tight, and the supernatural elements are handled in a way that enhances the overall suspense.

If you enjoy atmospheric thrillers with a supernatural edge, The House Next Door is definitely worth picking up. It’s an entertaining, chilling read that provides just the right amount of spookiness, making it perfect for a late-night reading session. Whether you’re a longtime fan of haunted house stories or just looking for a fun, eerie read, this book delivers exactly what you’d expect—a satisfying and unsettling ghostly mystery.

Queen of Spades (2021) Review: A Supernatural Thriller That Deals a Familiar Hand

Photo by jalil shams on Pexels.com

Introduction

Urban legends have long been a fertile ground for horror films, turning whispered myths into cinematic nightmares. From Candyman to Bloody Mary, these tales often hinge on the idea that saying the wrong name, at the wrong time, in the wrong place can invite something malevolent into our world. Queen of Spades (2021), directed by Patrick White, attempts to tap into that same vein of supernatural horror, drawing from a well-known Russian urban legend. The Queen of Spades is said to be a vengeful spirit who can be summoned through a ritual involving a mirror, much like Bloody Mary, but with far deadlier consequences. The film takes this chilling folklore and brings it to life, placing a group of unsuspecting teenagers in the path of the relentless entity.

The story follows a group of friends who, in typical horror fashion, stumble upon the ritual to summon the Queen of Spades and decide to test the legend for themselves. What starts as a seemingly harmless game quickly spirals into terror as the entity begins to hunt them down, picking them off one by one. Drawing clear inspiration from The Ring, Ouija, and other supernatural horror films centered around cursed rituals, Queen of Spades strives to deliver an eerie atmosphere, supernatural tension, and a vengeful ghost story. But does it succeed in adapting the chilling Russian legend into a gripping modern horror film, or is it simply a forgettable rehash of familiar tropes?

Horror Elements

One of Queen of Spades’ strongest elements is its foundation in folklore-based horror, drawing from the eerie Russian legend to create a sense of ritualistic dread. The film effectively sets up the summoning process, making the supernatural threat feel tangible and inevitable, much like the urban legends surrounding Bloody Mary or The Ring. By grounding the horror in a well-established myth, the story gains an extra layer of authenticity, as if the events could unfold in real life under the right (or wrong) circumstances.

Despite its limited budget, the film successfully cultivates a creepy atmosphere through dim lighting, eerie shadows, and unsettling reflections, using visual tricks to heighten the sense of paranoia and dread. The cinematography leans heavily on darkness, flickering lights, and confined spaces to create an oppressive mood, making every hallway, mirror, or shadowed corner feel like a potential gateway for the supernatural. The abandoned or dimly lit locations serve as perfect backdrops for supernatural encounters, reinforcing the feeling that the characters are never truly safe. The use of reflections is particularly effective, playing into the film’s theme of the Queen of Spades as a lurking, omnipresent force that can manifest at any time.

The film also employs sound design to enhance its eerie tone, with whispering voices, distant echoes, and sudden distortions that make the environment feel alive with unseen horrors. Subtle background noises add to the tension, creating the unsettling impression that something is always watching, even when nothing appears on screen. Moments of silence are used strategically, building anticipation before a scare, rather than relying solely on loud, jarring jump scares.

Additionally, the use of practical effects and minimal CGI helps maintain a sense of realism, ensuring that the horror feels tangible rather than overly stylized. The Queen of Spades herself is often hidden in the periphery, appearing in quick glimpses rather than being overexposed, which adds to the film’s psychological horror elements. By keeping the entity’s presence unpredictable, the film sustains a lingering sense of fear, making even mundane objects—like a mirror or a shadowed doorway—feel threatening. These atmospheric choices elevate the tension and contribute to the film’s most effective horror moments, demonstrating that even with a smaller budget, a well-crafted atmosphere can go a long way in creating genuine unease.

 While the film doesn’t break new ground in terms of scares, it does manage to deliver a few effective moments, particularly those involving mirrors and the entity’s sudden, unpredictable appearances. The use of reflections as a medium for horror adds to the film’s unsettling nature, creating a sense of disorientation and fear that lingers even in quieter scenes. Though the film may not be packed with relentless jump scares, its eerie visuals and suspenseful moments contribute to an atmosphere that fans of supernatural horror will likely appreciate.

Movie Elements

While Queen of Spades has a solid foundation in Russian folklore, its execution suffers from a lack of originality, making it feel like a retread of other, more effective supernatural horror films. The plot follows a familiar and predictable structure—reckless teenagers perform a ritual, unleash a vengeful entity, and desperately try to reverse their mistake as the body count rises. This well-worn formula, reminiscent of The Ring and Ouija, lacks fresh twists or unique storytelling elements to set it apart. The film leans heavily on genre conventions without subverting or expanding them in any meaningful way, making the story feel more like an imitation than a new take on the legend.

Compounding this issue is weak character development, as the protagonists feel like generic horror archetypes rather than fully realized individuals. The film doesn’t invest much time in making the audience care about the characters beyond their roles as inevitable victims. Their relationships and personalities remain shallow, offering little in the way of emotional stakes or personal struggles that might make their impending doom more impactful. Because of this, when the horror elements kick in, there’s a noticeable lack of tension—without compelling characters to root for, the scares become just a series of expected beats rather than moments of genuine suspense.

The acting in Queen of Spades (2021) is serviceable but ultimately unremarkable, with performances that fail to elevate the film beyond its predictable horror framework. The young cast, while competent, struggles to bring depth to their characters due to the script’s lack of development. Many of the protagonists fall into generic horror archetypes—the rebellious teen, the skeptic, the frightened believer—without much nuance or individuality. Because of this, their performances often feel flat, making it difficult for the audience to emotionally invest in their fates.

Lead performances do offer moments of genuine fear, particularly in the film’s more intense sequences, but these moments are inconsistent. Some scenes feature convincing expressions of terror, while others feel more forced or exaggerated, diminishing the overall impact. The lack of chemistry between the main characters also weakens the film’s emotional core, as their relationships feel underdeveloped and rushed. Without strong interpersonal dynamics, the stakes never feel as high as they should, making their inevitable confrontations with the supernatural entity less compelling.

The supporting cast fares slightly better, particularly in roles that lean into the film’s eerie atmosphere. Any adult characters, especially those tied to the legend or exposition-heavy moments, bring a sense of mystery and intrigue, though they often feel underutilized. The Queen of Spades herself, though mostly relying on physical presence and eerie movements rather than traditional acting, is effectively unsettling, adding to the film’s best horror moments. However, without standout performances or emotionally resonant characters, the acting in Queen of Spades does little to distinguish it from other mid-tier supernatural horror films.

Even the film’s execution of horror elements, which should have been its strongest asset, feels uninspired. Many of the scares are heavily telegraphed, following a predictable rhythm that makes them easy to see coming. The film also struggles with pacing, failing to build and sustain an atmosphere of dread. Instead, it rushes through character moments while dragging out less effective suspense sequences, leading to a disjointed feel. Without a strong hook, a well-developed antagonist, or a fresh take on its folklore-based premise, Queen of Spades ultimately becomes another forgettable entry in the supernatural horror genre. Despite the rich mythology behind its legend, the film fails to capitalize on its potential, offering little more than a formulaic and uninspired experience.

Conclusion

Queen of Spades (2021) is a passable supernatural horror film that delivers a handful of eerie moments but ultimately fails to stand out in an oversaturated genre. While it benefits from an unsettling atmosphere and a premise rooted in a chilling Russian urban legend, it struggles to bring anything new to the table. The film leans heavily on familiar horror tropes—an ancient ritual gone wrong, a vengeful spirit hunting down those who invoked it, and a desperate attempt to break the curse—all of which have been explored more effectively in other films. Rather than building on its folklore-inspired concept to create a unique and memorable horror experience, it plays things too safe, sticking to predictable plot beats that seasoned horror fans will see coming from a mile away. Although the film has moments of tension, particularly in its use of mirrors and reflections to heighten the supernatural element, these scares feel formulaic rather than genuinely terrifying. The pacing is uneven, with stretches of slow build-up that fail to create meaningful suspense, followed by rushed sequences of horror that lack impact. The characters, while serviceable, lack depth, making it difficult to connect with their struggles or fear for their survival. Without strong emotional stakes or a truly innovative take on its central legend, Queen of Spades ends up feeling like just another supernatural horror film rather than a standout entry in the genre. It’s watchable for those who enjoy ghostly folklore and classic urban legend horror, but it doesn’t do enough to leave a lasting impression.

Ultimate Verdict:

I’d rate Queen of Spades: Ominous mirror reflections that definitely weren’t there a second ago, out of 100.

Have you watched this movie?  What did you think of it?  Anything we missed? Have an idea for what we should watch next? Drop a comment below to let us know!

Link to Official Trailer

Leprechaun: Origins Review

Photo by Elias Tigiser on Pexels.com

Introduction

Leprechaun: Origins (2014) tries to take the franchise in a darker, more serious direction, but ends up stripping away everything that made the original Leprechaun movies fun. Instead of Warwick Davis’ mischievous, wisecracking killer, we get a generic, snarling creature that barely resembles a leprechaun at all. The story follows a group of American tourists in Ireland who stumble upon a cursed village and quickly become prey for the monstrous leprechaun.  As always, I watched this one twice, so let’s dive right in.

Horror Elements

The horror in this film leans heavily on dark, claustrophobic settings, as the characters find themselves trapped in a remote village where the locals have been offering sacrifices to keep the creature at bay. The filmmakers rely on a mix of creature horror and survival horror, creating a tense atmosphere as the protagonists try to escape an enemy they barely understand. Unfortunately, while the setting and setup have potential, the execution falls short, making the film feel more like a generic monster movie than a true Leprechaun reboot.

One of the film’s main horror elements is its creature design, which trades the recognizable, mischievous leprechaun for something more animalistic. The new leprechaun is barely seen for much of the movie, with quick cuts and shadowy glimpses used to build suspense before its full reveal. When we finally do see it, the design is underwhelming—it looks more like a hairless goblin or some kind of subterranean monster rather than a mythical Irish creature.  Honestly it reminded me of the cave-dwelling creatures in the movie “The Descent”, just not as scary. 

The film tries to use this more monstrous approach to create fear, but it lacks personality and memorable traits, making it hard for audiences to feel any real attachment or terror. The kills, while brutal, are mostly standard fare for creature features, with slashing, mauling, and the occasional gore shot, but none stand out as particularly inventive or shocking. Without a compelling villain at its core, the film struggles to maintain real tension or excitement.  

In case my previous two paragraphs weren’t clear enough, let me just emphasize: the monster in this movie does NOT resemble a Leprechaun in any way, shape, or form whatsoever. Honestly, it’s baffling. Not only does it completely abandon the leprechaun’s traditional look—the little green suit, the mischievous grin, the obsession with gold—but it also ditches all the playful, trickster qualities that made the original films so fun. Did I mention they gave this creature thermal vision? Yes, you heard that right. A leprechaun with thermal vision. In what corner of Irish folklore does it ever mention leprechauns being able to see heat signatures like a predator? I’m still scratching my head over that one. It feels like the filmmakers just slapped the Leprechaun name on this generic creature-feature without any understanding of the source material. 

I’m genuinely at a loss for how a movie with the Leprechaun name could get the entire concept of the monster so completely and utterly wrong. It’s not just a misstep; it’s a fundamental misunderstanding of what makes the franchise, and leprechauns themselves, memorable. The whole thing feels disconnected, like they tried to create something terrifying without any regard for the iconic myth they were supposedly working with. Did the film makers even watch any of the original movies?  Experience a St. Patty’s day celebration??  Eat a bowl of Lucky Charms???

Okay, done venting, back to my review…

The final major horror element is the sense of isolation and helplessness, as the characters find themselves hunted in unfamiliar territory. The Irish countryside, with its dense forests and eerie ruins, could have been used to great effect, but the film doesn’t fully take advantage of its setting. Instead, much of the action takes place in dimly lit barns and underground tunnels, which, while claustrophobic, don’t add much to the atmosphere. The villagers, who know more than they let on, provide a brief folk horror element, but their role is minimal and lacks depth. Without strong world-building or an engaging antagonist, Leprechaun: Origins fails to deliver the chilling, folklore-infused horror it aims for. Instead, it feels like a generic creature feature that just happens to use the Leprechaun name, making it a disappointment for both fans of the franchise and horror lovers looking for something fresh.

Movie Elements

Leprechaun: Origins seriously lacks creativity, which is a huge letdown for a franchise known for its weird, over-the-top fun. Instead of putting a fresh spin on the classic leprechaun myth, the movie strips away everything unique and replaces it with a generic monster flick that could’ve been about any random creature. The leprechaun itself doesn’t even look or act like one—it’s just a mindless, growling beast that spends most of the movie lurking in the shadows. There’s no personality, no clever kills, and no fun mythology to make it stand out. Even the setting, rural Ireland, could have been used to add some eerie folklore vibes, but the film barely takes advantage of it. Instead, we get a by-the-numbers survival horror movie that could’ve been called anything else and no one would have noticed. For a reboot, it plays things way too safe, making Leprechaun: Origins feel more like a forgettable SyFy Channel creature feature than a fresh take on a cult classic.

The acting in Leprechaun: Origins is as forgettable as the rest of the movie. The cast, made up mostly of unknowns, delivers bland and uninspired performances, with characters that feel more like horror movie stereotypes than real people. You’ve got the standard group of clueless American tourists who make dumb decisions and spend most of the movie either screaming or arguing. There’s no real chemistry between them, and since the script doesn’t give them much to work with, it’s hard to care about anyone’s survival. Even WWE’s Dylan “Hornswoggle” Postl, who plays the leprechaun, is completely wasted since the creature is barely seen and has no personality. Without a strong villain or interesting protagonists, the performances fall flat, making the movie feel even more lifeless than it already is.

The cinematography is just as disappointing as the rest of the film. Instead of using the Irish countryside (it doesn’t look like Ireland) to create an eerie, atmospheric horror vibe, most of the movie is shot in dark, cramped locations that make it hard to see what’s going on. The filmmakers rely way too much on shaky cam and quick cuts, especially during action scenes, which makes the few monster attacks more frustrating than scary. Even when the leprechaun is on screen, the camera work and lighting hide it so much that you never get a good look at the creature.  There was a real opportunity to use moody lighting, creative angles, or even some cool folklore-inspired visuals, but instead, we get a generic, poorly lit horror movie.  Side note- why are all the villagers dressed as though they’re from the mid 1900s?  What was the point of that?

Let me just say, it was seriously tough for me to sit through this one twice because it was just so bland and boring. The pacing dragged, the dialogue was lifeless, and there was absolutely nothing that kept me invested in what was happening on screen. Not only was I able to guess the entire plot within the first 15 minutes, but I even predicted the exact order in which the main characters would die—down to the last survivor. There were no surprises, no twists, and definitely no moments that made me feel even the slightest bit of suspense. I kept hoping for something—anything—to shake things up, but it just stuck to the most generic horror formula possible. I mean, come on… if your movie is this predictable, at least make it fun or give us a villain worth watching. Instead, I was left counting the minutes until it was finally over.

Conclusion

While the film attempts to go for a gritty, creature-feature vibe, it falls flat with forgettable characters, dull kills, and a lack of the franchise’s signature campy charm. Honestly, if the movie had been named anything-and I mean ANYthing else, I would have said it wasn’t half bad.  I probably could have enjoyed it a bit.  But they didn’t- they called this movie Leprechaun Origins because this was supposed to be a reboot for the beloved cult classic.  If you’re looking for the goofy, over-the-top fun of the original Leprechaun films, you won’t find it here—just a bland, uninspired horror flick that doesn’t do the series any favors.  

Final Scare Me Please Score:  That is not a leprechaun, out of 100

Link to Official Trailer

Have you watched this movie?  What did you think of it?   Was it just as disappointing to you as it was to us?  Anything we missed? Have an idea for what we should watch next? Drop a comment below to let us know!

Ghost Stories Review

Introduction

Ghost Stories (2017) is a chilling British horror anthology that blends psychological and supernatural terror into a suspenseful, twist-laden film. Directed by Jeremy Dyson and Andy Nyman, the film follows Professor Philip Goodman, a skeptical investigator of paranormal claims, as he examines three disturbing cases that challenge his beliefs. With its eerie atmosphere, unsettling storytelling, and strong performances, Ghost Stories aims to pay homage to classic horror anthologies while offering a fresh take on the genre.

Let me be upfront by saying I am a huge fan of horror movie anthologies—I seem to enjoy them even when they aren’t particularly well-made. There’s something about the structure of interconnected, bite-sized tales of terror that I find irresistible. However, that doesn’t mean I can’t recognize when an anthology falls flat or fails to deliver a satisfying experience. Some rely too heavily on jump scares, while others struggle with pacing or weak wraparound stories. So where does Ghost Stories rank among its peers? Does it deliver a hauntingly memorable experience, or is it just another forgettable entry in the genre? Let’s take a closer look.

Horror Elements

At the beginning of the movie, the true antagonist isn’t immediately clear, as the film presents itself as a straightforward supernatural investigation. Initially, the cases Professor Philip Goodman examines seem to suggest that the ghosts and demons haunting the victims are the primary sources of terror. However, as the film progresses, it becomes evident that the real antagonist is something far more psychological—Goodman himself. His deep-seated guilt and suppressed trauma manifest through the terrifying stories he encounters, leading to a shocking revelation that reframes the entire narrative. The sinister force at play isn’t just the supernatural but the haunting nature of Goodman’s own mind, making Ghost Stories as much a psychological thriller as it is a horror film.  Honestly, I went into this movie not knowing this (the trailer doesn’t give too much away), so I initially thought this was just going to be another supernatural-scares sort of film.  This made the psychological twist so much more powerful at the end.  

Professor Philip Goodman is a highly believable protagonist in Ghost Stories (2017), thanks to both strong writing and Andy Nyman’s nuanced performance. As a skeptic and debunker of the paranormal, Goodman is grounded in logic and reason, making his descent into fear and uncertainty all the more compelling. His reactions to the eerie events he investigates feel natural—initially dismissive, then subtly unnerved, and eventually completely unraveled. Unlike many horror protagonists who make irrational decisions for the sake of scares, Goodman approaches each case methodically, making his transformation into a man questioning his own reality all the more effective.  This slow suspenseful build only adds to the horror. His backstory, which is gradually revealed, adds layers to his character, making him not just a vessel for the audience but a deeply flawed and human figure whose fears are far more psychological than supernatural.

In addition to having a believable protagonist, I also felt as though the different characters’ reactions were uniquely portrayed by their character and realistic.  With the first case to be examined, that of Tony Matthews, his reaction to the supernatural events reflects what his character would actually do:  turn on a happy song up loud, call his co-worker for comfort, pick up a hammer (weapon), and call out a threat to whatever is out in the darkness tormenting him.  Simon Rifkind, the second case study, reacts in a similar fashion in that he attempts to grab a weapon (a rolled up map is better than nothing).  Instead of going into “fight mode” as Matthews did, he instead chooses to run from the car when the monster enters it.  Considering how fragile his character seems, this fits what he’d actually do quite well.  Finally, Mike Priddle, the 3rd and final character, reacts differently as well.  Being an intelligent business man, he approaches paranormal events with a logical approach.  For example, when the baby diapers fly across the floor in the nursery, he checks all the windows for a potential draft.  Again, it fits his character and I appreciate these subtle differences immensely.  

Movie Elements

While many anthologies rely on disconnected short tales with a simple wraparound narrative, Ghost Stories cleverly weaves its segments into a larger, more cohesive mystery that builds toward an unexpected and deeply unsettling conclusion.  Additionally, its willingness to subvert expectations—particularly in how it recontextualizes its supernatural elements—adds a layer of depth rarely seen in traditional anthology horror. Rather than just telling scary stories, the film ultimately explores the nature of fear, guilt, and the fragile state of the human mind, making it a refreshingly original entry in the genre.  

The pacing of Ghost Stories is deliberate, gradually building tension rather than relying on constant scares or action. The film takes its time establishing atmosphere and character, particularly through Professor Philip Goodman’s methodical investigations. Each of the three cases unfolds with a slow, creeping dread, allowing the horror to simmer rather than explode all at once. While this approach effectively heightens suspense, some viewers may find the film’s measured pace a bit too restrained, especially in the first half. However, the steady buildup pays off in the final act, where the narrative accelerates into a surreal, mind-bending climax. The film’s pacing ultimately mirrors its psychological themes—drawing the audience deeper into Goodman’s unraveling reality—making for an experience that is unsettling, if at times intentionally slow-burning.

Acting is one of the film’s strongest aspects, with each performance adding depth and authenticity to the film’s eerie atmosphere. Andy Nyman delivers a compelling lead performance as Professor Philip Goodman, perfectly capturing his character’s skepticism, growing unease, and eventual unraveling. Paul Whitehouse, Alex Lawther, and Martin Freeman each bring something unique to their respective segments.  

Whitehouse portrays a working-class man haunted by a tragic encounter with raw realism.  In fact ,as I was watching his story unfold, I couldn’t help but be reminded of someone I knew exactly like him that I worked with many years back.  Specifically, when the spooky stuff starts to happen to him during his night shift, he kind of blows it off at first, something I felt to be very much, Lawther’s performance as a deeply disturbed teenager is intensely unsettling, and Freeman adds a charismatic yet chilling presence that lingers long after his scenes. The cast’s commitment to their roles makes the supernatural elements feel all the more believable, elevating Ghost Stories beyond a typical horror anthology into something far more psychological and immersive.

Cinematography was yet another aspect of the film that was done well. The camera often lingers on empty spaces, creating a sense of unease and suggesting the presence of something unseen. The use of dim lighting and shadowy compositions heightens the feeling of claustrophobia and uncertainty, with scenes that seem to be on the edge of revealing something terrifying, but never fully expose it until the right moment. The framing is precise, often focusing on the protagonist’s reactions or the subtle movement in the background, adding to the unease. Particularly effective are the moments when the camera holds on still shots, allowing the audience to linger in the discomfort of a scene, with every shadow or flicker of light amplifying the growing sense of dread. One specific example of this is during a scene with the character Tony Matthews.  After exploring the far end of the basement level of his building and discovering nothing amiss, he tries to calm his nerves by smoking a cigarette.  In the background, the audience can see the lights in the hallway behind him turn off one by one; this was incredibly effective.  

Conclusion

Overall, Ghost Stories is a meticulously crafted horror anthology that blends supernatural chills with psychological depth, offering a uniquely unsettling experience. With strong performances, a slow-burning but effective pace, and masterful use of cinematography and sound design, the film builds an eerie, immersive atmosphere that almost requires a second viewing. While its deliberate pacing and layered storytelling may not appeal to all horror fans, those who appreciate psychological horror and well-executed suspense will find plenty to admire.  As I’ve mentioned in other articles, I have ADHD.  With this in mind, when I say that this movie captured my full interest, it means it was extremely interesting.  I like to take notes during both my viewings of the movies I review, and with this one I actually had to pause it so I could jot stuff down as I didn’t want to miss a single second.  More than just a collection of ghostly encounters, Ghost Stories is a chilling exploration of guilt, fear, and the blurred lines between reality and the mind’s darkest corners.

Final Scare Me Please Score:  Coma from hell, out of 100

Link To Official Trailer

Have you watched this movie?  What did you think of it?   Did you guess the ending? Which was the scariest story to you?  Anything we missed? Have an idea for what we should watch next? Drop a comment below to let us know!

The Cleaning Lady Review

Introduction

Directed by Jon Knautz, “The Cleaning Lady” opens with a deeply disturbing sequence that sets the tone for the film’s exploration of obsession and trauma.  What might this introductory sequence be?  In simple terms:  rat smoothie.  Yes, you read that correctly and let me just say I’ve had a multitude of ratties as pets over the years which made the opening scene quite upsetting.  This psychological horror movie centers on Alice, a woman trying to simplify her life and overcome an affair by befriending her cleaning lady, Shelly. However, as their friendship deepens, Alice discovers that Shelly harbors dark secrets and a twisted past which tries to justify the “rat smoothie” the viewer is forced to endure within the first 5 minutes of the movie. The director attempts to intertwine themes of loneliness, manipulation, and the haunting impact of past traumas in a way that scares the audience; let’s take a deeper look at whether or not this was accomplished.

Horror Elements

“The Cleaning Lady” introduces audiences to a unique and haunting antagonist in the form of Shelly, portrayed with unsettling intensity by Rachel Alig. Unlike typical horror villains, Shelly’s menace is rooted in her tragic and twisted past, which has left her physically and emotionally scarred. Her outward appearance, marred by severe burns, masks an even more disturbing inner darkness. Shelly’s actions are driven by a complex mix of envy, obsession, and a desperate longing for connection, making her both sympathetic and terrifying. Her meticulous and calculated manipulation of Alice reveals a deeply disturbed mind, capable of orchestrating chilling acts of psychological and physical torment. Shelly’s character stands out in the horror genre for her layered backstory and the profound sense of unease she evokes, making her a memorable and uniquely horrifying antagonist.

The story’s core elements—loneliness, obsession, and the lingering effects of trauma—are deeply rooted in real human experiences, making the characters’ actions and motivations chillingly believable. Shelly’s physical scars and emotional wounds reflect a realistic portrayal of how past abuse and neglect can shape one’s psyche, driving her to extreme and terrifying behaviors. The film’s setting, primarily within the confines of ordinary, everyday spaces like Alice’s home, enhances the sense of realism by juxtaposing the familiar with the sinister. This grounded approach to horror makes the unfolding events feel plausible and immediate, intensifying the audience’s emotional response.

Shelly, the unsettling antagonist of “The Cleaning Lady,” has a backstory steeped in trauma and tragedy, which profoundly shapes her disturbing behavior. Born into an abusive household, Shelly endured unimaginable suffering at the hands of her mother, who inflicted severe burns on her as a form of punishment. These physical scars are a constant reminder of her painful past, but it is the emotional scars that drive her actions. Isolated and tormented, Shelly’s psyche becomes twisted, leading her to develop an obsession with cleanliness as a way to control her chaotic life. Her need for connection and acceptance manifests in a dangerous fixation on Alice, a woman she cleans for, whom she perceives as perfect and unattainable. Shelly’s tragic past and the abuse she suffered create a complex and sympathetic villain, whose actions, while horrifying, are rooted in a desperate longing for the love and normalcy she never experienced. 

Suspense is mostly accomplished via the growing bond between Alice and Shelly.  This relationship  is laced with an ever-present sense of dread, as Shelly’s true nature and intentions slowly come to light. The suspense is heightened by the claustrophobic setting, primarily confined to Alice’s home, which transforms from a safe haven into a prison of psychological torment. Director Jon Knautz uses tight, intimate shots and a haunting score to amplify the feeling of unease, drawing the audience deeper into the twisted dynamics between the characters. As the film progresses, the suspense intensifies, culminating in a series of shocking and unpredictable twists that leave viewers both horrified and enthralled. 

The sound design meticulously uses subtle, everyday noises—such as the scraping of a cleaning brush, the clinking of glass, and the hum of household appliances—to create an eerie sense of normalcy twisted into something sinister. The soundtrack’s sparse, haunting melodies punctuate moments of quiet tension, building an almost unbearable suspense as Shelly’s dark past and intentions are gradually revealed.  Alice, the protagonist of “The Cleaning Lady,” is portrayed with a level of complexity and realism that makes her a believable and relatable character. As a woman struggling with personal demons, including an extramarital affair and a sense of emptiness, Alice’s vulnerability and attempts at self-improvement are convincingly depicted. Her decision to befriend Shelly, driven by a mix of compassion and a desire for distraction from her own problems, feels authentic and grounded in her character’s emotional state.

Alice’s gradual realization of Shelly’s dark side and her increasing entanglement in Shelly’s disturbing world are portrayed with a genuine sense of fear and desperation. Her reactions to the escalating horror are realistic, reflecting a blend of disbelief, horror, and survival instinct that resonates with the audience. Despite some moments that may require a slight suspension of disbelief, such as her continued interactions with Shelly despite growing red flags, Alice’s journey is overall compelling and believable. Her character’s depth and relatability add to the film’s psychological tension, making the unfolding events all the more gripping and horrifying.

Movie Elements

“The Cleaning Lady” brings a fresh perspective to the horror genre by intertwining themes of psychological trauma, obsession, and the quest for human connection in a unique and unsettling narrative. Unlike conventional horror films that rely heavily on supernatural elements or overt gore, this movie focuses on the chilling dynamics between its characters and the horrors rooted in real human experiences. Shelly, as the antagonist, stands out with her tragic backstory and complex motivations, offering a villain who evokes both fear and a degree of sympathy.

The film’s setting—a seemingly ordinary home that becomes a site of psychological and physical terror—adds to its originality. The use of everyday objects and routines, like cleaning, to build suspense and horror is both innovative and deeply unnerving. This approach not only subverts common horror tropes but also makes the terror feel more immediate and relatable.  Additionally, “The Cleaning Lady” explores the intricate psychological interplay between its characters, particularly the twisted bond between Alice and Shelly. This focus on character-driven horror, combined with the film’s disturbing yet plausible scenarios, sets it apart in the genre, making it a standout for its originality and depth. 

 While “The Cleaning Lady” succeeds in creating a disturbing atmosphere and intriguing characters, its pacing is a notable drawback. The film starts with a strong, eerie introduction but soon lapses into a slow buildup that may test the patience of some viewers. Key plot developments unfold at a sluggish pace, and the tension that is carefully built often dissipates due to lengthy, drawn-out scenes that could have been more tightly edited.  The middle portion of the film, in particular, suffers from this slow pacing, as it delves deeply into character interactions and backstory without advancing the plot significantly. This can lead to a sense of stagnation, where the initial suspense wanes and the audience is left waiting for the next significant event. While the detailed exploration of characters is commendable, the film occasionally prioritizes this over maintaining a consistent sense of urgency and suspense.  The pacing issues become more pronounced when the story finally shifts gears towards the climax. The sudden acceleration of events can feel jarring, contrasting sharply with the earlier, more leisurely pace. This uneven pacing detracts from the overall tension and makes the climax feel somewhat rushed and less impactful.  Overall, while “The Cleaning Lady” excels in atmosphere and character development, its poor pacing hampers the film’s ability to sustain suspense and fully engage the audience throughout its runtime.

Rachel Alig, as Shelly, is particularly effective in her role, bringing a chilling intensity to her character. Alig’s performance captures the duality of Shelly’s personality—her outward appearance as a quiet, unassuming cleaning lady and her hidden, deeply disturbed nature. The subtlety with which Alig portrays Shelly’s growing obsession and manipulative tendencies adds to the film’s unsettling atmosphere, making her a compelling and memorable antagonist.  The supporting cast also contributes to the film’s overall impact, with each actor enhancing the story’s tension and emotional depth. The interactions between the characters feel organic, and the chemistry between Kendra and Alig is especially noteworthy, driving the narrative forward and heightening the psychological stakes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, “The Cleaning Lady” ultimately falls short of its potential, hindered by its uneven pacing and lackluster plot development. While the performances by Alexis Kendra and Rachel Alig are commendable, they cannot fully compensate for the film’s drawn-out middle act and predictable storyline. The movie’s attempts at building suspense often feel forced, and the reliance on familiar horror tropes detracts from any sense of originality. Despite a few genuinely unsettling moments, “The Cleaning Lady” fails to maintain a consistent level of tension or deliver a truly compelling horror experience, leaving viewers more frustrated than frightened.  

Final Scare Me Please Score: “Rat smoothie” should not be a thing, out of 100

Link To Official Trailer

Have you watched this movie? Did you dislike it as much as we did?  Drop a comment below to let us know!